ANTIKOR — national anti-corruption portal
Kyiv: 8°C
Kharkiv: 8°C
Dnipro: 8°C
Odesa: 8°C
Chernihiv: 9°C
Sumy: 8°C
Lviv: 4°C
Uzhhorod: 8°C
Lutsk: 4°C
Rivne: 3°C

The collapse of the illusion of safety: how the Holosiivskyi tragedy dealt a blow to police reform and the Ministry of Internal Affairs’ licensing system

Читати українськоюЧитать на русском
The collapse of the illusion of safety: how the Holosiivskyi tragedy dealt a blow to police reform and the Ministry of Internal Affairs’ licensing system
The collapse of the illusion of safety: how the Holosiivskyi tragedy dealt a blow to police reform and the Ministry of Internal Affairs’ licensing system

The tragedy that unfolded in Kyiv’s Holosiivskyi district on April 18, 2026, became not just another criminal episode, but a point of no return for the domestic law enforcement system.

About this, "Argument" writes.

When 58-year-old native of Moscow Dmytro Vasylchenkov stepped out onto Demiivska Street with a carbine in his hands, he not only killed six people but also effectively shot down society’s faith in the motto "to serve and protect."

Footage from dashcams and surveillance cameras showing patrol police officers fleeing from the sounds of gunfire, leaving civilians in mortal danger, triggered tectonic shifts in the Ministry of Internal Affairs leadership and reignited the sharpest debate of recent years — about citizens’ right to armed self-defense.

Anatomy of chaos and professional capitulation

Photo of the day dxzzyqzdhyextyhzzzyqxuyettzyzzuryzuqant

The events unfolded according to the script of a classic mass shooting, more typical of American realities than Ukraine’s capital. Setting his own apartment on fire, chaotic shooting at passersby, cold-blooded murder of entire families, and subsequent taking of hostages in a supermarket — all this lasted mere tens of minutes.

However, these very minutes proved critical for assessing the professional fitness of the first police crews. The resignation of the Head of the Patrol Police Department Yevhen Zhukov and the Minister Ihor Klymenko’s order to conduct an internal investigation are merely the tip of the iceberg.

The "flight from danger" problem is not unique to Ukraine. World history knows similar cases, the most notorious of which was the shooting at Robb Elementary School (Uvalde, Texas) in 2022. Then, hundreds of police officers stayed in the corridor for over an hour while the killer shot children in classrooms.

Psychologists call it "paralysis from fear," but for the justice system, it qualifies as abandonment in danger. In the Kyiv case, the situation looks even more shameful due to the presence of defenseless children and wounded on site, who were not provided timely first aid only due to a lack of courage in those paid to take risks.

"They were supposed to save, but they got disoriented and left civilians in danger," — these words of Yevhen Zhukov during the resignation announcement put a cross on the former personnel training system, where a patrol officer was seen as a service worker, not a combat unit ready for firefight contact.

Russian Trace and Defects of the Permitting System

The attacker’s identity raises no fewer questions. Dmytro Vasylchenkov, with a background from occupied territories and Russia’s Ryazan, had been on law enforcement’s radar for years. His anti-Ukrainian and antisemitic posts on social media, previous conviction for a supermarket brawl — all this should have been "red flags" for the permitting system.

Instead, in December 2025, he effortlessly renewed his permit for the carbine, which later became the instrument of the terrorist attack.

This points to deep corruption or formalism in medical and administrative procedures. How did a person with an obviously unstable mental state (according to the Ministry of Internal Affairs assessment) manage to get certificates from a psychiatrist?

Terrorist Dmytro Vasylchenkov / © Vitaliy Hlahola

Terrorist Dmytro Vasylchenkov / © Vitaliy Hlahola

This question takes the issue beyond the specific crime and questions the effectiveness of state control over weapons in general. If the system cannot filter out potential terrorists, does it have the moral right to restrict law-abiding citizens’ right to bear arms?

Legalization dilemma: will a "good guy with a gun" help?

Bodies of the deceased at the shooting site in Kyiv. April 18, 2026

After the tragedy, Minister Ihor Klymenko made a sensational statement supporting the right to armed self-defense, including short-barreled firearms.

This is a radical change in the Ministry of Internal Affairs’ position, which had previously been more conservative. The argument of legalization supporters is simple: if there had been at least one armed person in the supermarket or on Demiivska Street, the attacker could have been stopped much earlier, without waiting 40 minutes for the KORD assault.

U.S. experience shows a dual picture. On one hand, there are hundreds of cases where armed civilians stopped mass killings (the so-called "Good guy with a gun" theory).

On the other — free access to guns correlates with the overall increase in mass shootings. However, the Ukrainian context is unique: the country is at war, millions of unregistered weapons are already in civilian hands, and trust in patrol police after the Holosiiv incident has dropped to a critical level.

World practice shows: in countries with a high gun ownership culture (e.g., Czechia or Switzerland), crime rates are not higher, and sometimes even lower, than in countries with strict restrictions.

The problem is not the metal in the pocket, but society’s and law enforcers’ readiness to act decisively.

Conclusions for the future

The qualification of the event as a "terrorist act" (Article 258 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) remains debatable among lawyers, as the killer made no demands. However, for society, it was an act of pure terror. The Holosiyevo tragedy should become a catalyst for two processes: radical purging of police ranks of unfit elements and adoption of a civilian weapons law that will finally bring self-defense out of legal uncertainty.

We cannot afford a police that flees from gunfire and at the same time forbid citizens from protecting themselves. The state must either guarantee security through its agencies or provide citizens with survival tools.

The Holosiivskyi massacre showed that neither option works in Ukraine right now. The time for "expert discussions" is over — the time for responsible decisions has come, where the price of error is the lives of 12-year-old children left orphans on the asphalt of their native city.

Author: Oleksa Zakhar


Topics: Dmytro VasylchenkovShootingAct of terrorismNational PoliceKyiv

Alina Kravchenko
Journalist, Columnist
Date and time 20 April 2026 г., 17:34     Views Views: 2742
Comments Comments: 0


Comments:

comments powered by Disqus
07 May 2026 y.
loading...
Загрузка...

Our polls

Do you believe Donald Trump will be able to stop the war between Russia and Ukraine?







Show Poll results
Show all polls on the website
0.042457